Unmasking the Myth of ‘Clean Beauty’ and Embracing Skincare Science

The Illusion of “Clean Beauty”

“Clean beauty” has become a buzzword reverberating through the skincare industry, a term that seemingly offers a promise of purity, safety, and ethical production. However, upon closer examination, “clean beauty” is often a nebulous concept, lacking a universally accepted definition, and can misleadingly imply that anything not labelled ‘clean’ is inherently harmful or ‘dirty’. This term can, therefore, be classified as “weasel words” – language that appears assertive but is actually evasive or misleading.

Decoding “Weasel Words” in Skincare

Weasel words are vague or ambiguous terms used to create an impression of certainty or authority while remaining non-committal or misleading. Common in marketing and political language, these phrases—like “up to,” “studies show,” or “people say”—can obscure the truth or give statements a misleading spin without making a firm commitment. While not inherently deceitful, weasel words can be used to dodge direct assertions or to advertise claims that lack substantial evidence.

The Regulatory Gap in “Clean Beauty” Claims

Regulatory bodies such as the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) do not have a standard definition for what constitutes “clean beauty” in skincare, leading to a variety of interpretations by different brands. They are starting to come down hard on companies for “greenwashing“, so will “cleanwashing” be next in their sights? This lack of standardisation means that the term can be used indiscriminately to market products without substantive proof of the claims. Secondly, the suggestion that “clean” products are free from chemicals is misleading, as all matter is composed of chemicals, whether they are derived from natural sources or synthesised.

The Misconception of Chemical-Free Cosmetics

The concept of “clean beauty” plays into the fear of the unfamiliar, where synthetically produced ingredients are often vilified despite scientific evidence showing they can be safe and effective. This chemophobia overshadows the fact that many natural ingredients can be irritants or allergens, and synthetic ingredients are sometimes more sustainable and can be purer than their natural counterparts.

Identifying Trustworthy Skincare Messages

So, given the ambiguity of “clean beauty”, what are the trusted messages to look for when choosing skincare?

Evidence-Based Formulations

Trust should be placed in products formulated on the basis of peer-reviewed scientific research. Ingredients should have a proven track record of efficacy and safety, supported by reputable studies. For instance, retinoids for acne or vitamin C for antioxidative protection are widely acknowledged in dermatological literature for their benefits.

Transparency and Honesty

Brands should be upfront about their formulations, production processes, and ingredient sourcing. Trustworthy skincare brands don’t rely on fear-mongering about “toxins” but rather provide comprehensive information, allowing consumers to make informed decisions. Look for products with clear labelling that includes ingredient concentrations and the purpose of each component within the formula.

Beyond the “Clean Beauty” Hype

While “clean beauty” may capture the zeitgeist of a growing preference for products perceived as natural or non-toxic, the term itself is not a reliable indicator of the quality or safety of skincare products. Consumers would be well-advised to look beyond marketing jargon and focus on evidence-based formulations, transparency, and regulatory compliance when selecting skincare products. These trusted messages are not just superficial claims but are backed by rigorous science and ethical practices, aligning with the mission to provide skincare that is both effective and responsible. This approach to skincare not only challenges the status quo but also contributes to a market that is informed, discerning, and aligned with the values of integrity and authenticity.